top of page

Fauvism 1904 - 1908

The first breakthrough event in twentieth century art was the 1905 Salon d'Autumne with its scandalous 'Fauve' paintings.

 

The so-called Fauve artists showed in a single room, known as Salle VII.  One painting in particular, Matisse's Woman with a Hat, caused the same level of controversy as Manet had years before with Olympia.

 

(In the same year, Manet's painting of Berthe Morisot, was considered to be quite modern, but acceptable to the Jury.) The paintings in Salle VII were considered by most to be irredeemably ugly. 

 

However, painter Maurice Denis described the exhibition in the following way, "When one enters the gallery devoted to their work, at the sight of these landscapes, these figure studies, these simple designs, all of them violent in colour, one prepares to examine their intentions, to learn their theories; and one feels completely in the realm of abstraction. Of course, as in the most extreme departures of van Gogh, something still remains of the original feeling of nature.

 

But here one finds, above all in the work of Matisse paintings outside every contingency, painting in itself, the act of pure painting.

 

All the qualities of the picture other than the contrasts of line and colour, everything which the rational mind of the painter has not controlled, everything which comes from our instinct and from nature, finally all the factors of representation and of feeling are excluded from the work of art.

 

Here is, in fact, a search for the absolute. Yet, strange contradiction, this absolute is limited by the one thing in the world that is most relative: individual emotion".

 

source: Russell T Clement, Les Fauves, A Sourcebook, 1994

 

1905 Salon de Automne

Édouard Manet

Berthe Morisot, 1905

Henri Matisse, Woman with a Hat, 1905

online Modern Art appreciation program

online Modern Art appreciation course

Matisse Woman with a Hat, 1905

 

First exhibited at the 1905 Salon d'Automne in Paris, this painting is of Matisse's wife, Amelie. She is depicted in an elaborate outfit with classic attributes of the French bourgeoisie: a gloved arm holding a fan and an elaborate hat perched atop her head.

 

The critic Camille Mauclair said “A pot of paint has been flung in the face of the public,” while Leo Stein, who bought the painting, described the work as “the nastiest smear of paint I had ever seen.”

 

When asked about the hue of the dress Madame Matisse was actually wearing when she posed for the portrait, the artist allegedly replied, "Black, of course."

 

Matisse commented on his work of this period: "I had the sensation of an object's colouring; I applied the colour and this was the first colour on my canvas. I added to this a second colour, and then, if this second colour did not appear to agree with the first, instead of taking it off I added a third, which reconciled them. I then had to continue this way until I felt that I had established a completely harmonious canvas and that I was emptied of the emotion that made me enjoy it."

 

 

Matisse - Woman with a Hat

Woman with the Hat combines pointillist colour with post-impressionistic technique. Matisse had studied Paul Signac’s use of pure colour and his organisation of the picture plane through contrasting complementary pairs.

 

In doing so, Matisse created an energetic, even a tense effect. The pairs of complimentary colour are repeated in different parts of the painting. While they structure the work, they also encourage the movement of the spectator’s eye that does not stop at any given point.

 

However, in the process, Matisse moves away from Signac’s pointillist dot. His thick and flat contours borrow from the post-impressionists painters such as Paul Gauguin and Vincent van Gogh rather than from Signac. For a contemporary spectator, Matisse’s Woman with the Hat appeared less finished than Signac’s painstakingly detailed technique of pointillism.

Paul Signac,  Woman with an Umbrella (portrait of Signac's wife Berthe) 1893

The Fauves ( 'wild beasts' in French) were a group of French artists who applied intensely bright colours to their canvases in rough, instinctive brush strokes.  (The name was coined by a critic and was not used by the arists themselves.) 

 

Fauvism caused shockwaves as there was often no relationship between the colour used for a subject and its actual colour.  The Fauve painters broke with older, traditional methods of perception. Details were omitted in favour of simplified scenes, featuring flat areas of pigment.

 

The Fauves generally rejected the fantastic imagery of the Post-Impressionists, and returned to the more traditional subjects preferred by the Impressionists, such as landscapes, cityscapes, and scenes of bourgeois leisure.

 

Much like Van Gogh, Gauguin and Cézanne (all skilled colourists in their own right),  the Fauves wanted to paint what they saw and to turn that act of painting into an emotional and often spontaneous journey; their work, a record of each journey, was defined by the colours and evident brush motions on the canvas.  Matisse claimed that colour and form could only achieve their full potential if they become independent from the objects they depicted.

 

Henri Matisse

Henri Matisse

Luxury, Calm and Pleasure 1904. The forms in the painting—the figures, tree, bush, sea and sky—are created from spots of color, jabs of the brush that build up the picture. Matisse favoured discrete strokes of colour that emphasized the painted surface rather than a realistic scene. He also used a palette of pure, high-pitched primary colours (blue, green, yellow, and orange) to render the landscape, and then outlined the figures in blue.

Andre Derain

Andre Derain

Madame Matisse au Kimono 1905. Matisse and embarked on an artistic collaboration in Collioure, France, that would change the course of modern art. This richly detailed painting portrays Matisse’s wife in an elegant, patterned kimono, a signature piece in which she was painted by several of the Fauve artists during this period. It stands as a lasting symbol of the unique camaraderie that flourished between the two artists that summer.

Maurice de Vlaminck

Maurice de Vlaminck

The River Seine at Chatou 1906. A colourful and many-sided character, as a young man he earned his living mainly as a racing cyclist and orchestral violinist, painting in his spare time virtually without instruction. Indeed, he delighted to inveigh against all forms of academic training and boasted that he had never set foot inside the Louvre. Chatou, now a suburb of Paris, was a small village situated to the west, along the Seine.

Henri Matisse

Henri Matisse

Joy of Life 1905 - 06. It is a large scale painting depicting an Arcadian landscape filled with brilliantly colored forest, meadow, sea, and sky and populated by nude figures both at rest and in motion. As with the earlier Fauve canvases, colour is responsive only to emotional expression and the formal needs of the canvas, not the realities of nature. The references are many, but in form and date, Joy of Life (Bonheur de Vivre) is closest to Cézanne’s last great image of bathers.

Raoul Dufy

Raoul Dufy

Boats at Martigues c 1908. Dufy developed a colorful, decorative style that became fashionable for designs of ceramics and textiles, as well as decorative schemes for public buildings. He is noted for scenes of open-air social events. He was also a draftsman, printmaker, book illustrator, Scenic designer, a designer of furniture, and a planner of public spaces.

Matisse Young Sailor I 1906

Matisse Young Sailor I 1906

In “Young Sailor I” Germain looks out warily from the corner of his eyes; his thick, red lips are downturned. He seems ill at ease, borderline belligerent as if in a second he will leap up and disappear. The painting’s sketchiness—the almost transparent dashes of blue and green and slashes of red, orange and purple—build on the restlessness conveyed by his expression and pose. It is a bold, moody work.

Matisse Young Sailor II 1906

Matisse Young Sailor II 1906

Bold, however, is too tame a word for “Young Sailor II” with its lurid, solid-pink background, saturated blues and greens of his cap, pullover and trousers, one leg turned up to reveal the fat green-and-white check of the lining. The boy’s glowing-red right ear stands out from a face that looks like an African mask, with large almond-shaped eyes and a pointy nose.

Albert Marquet

Albert Marquet

Street Lamp Arcueil. 1899 His early compositions were characterised by a clear and painterly Fauvist approach, in which he had a fine control of the drawing and responded to light, not only by intensifying the strongest tones, but also by seeing the weaker ones in colouristic terms. In 1905 he exhibited at the Salon d'Automne where his paintings were put together with other Fauves

Maurice de Vlaminck

Maurice de Vlaminck

Restaurant La Machine at Bougival c 1905. To paint the buildings, Vlaminck has moved off the path just after a bend in the road. Although he has chosen a compositional model dear to the Impressionists, he has framed it much more closely. The colour and brushstrokes also contribute to a very individual kind of construction which has something of the work of Vincent van Gogh. He has used dynamic brushstrokes which structure the forms and the thick paint favoured by the Dutch master.

Raoul Dufy

Raoul Dufy

On the 4th of July at Le Havre 1906. Dufy's cheerful oils and watercolors depict events of the time period, including yachting scenes, sparkling views of the French Riviera, chic parties, and musical events. The optimistic, fashionably decorative, and illustrative nature of much of his work has meant that his output has been less highly valued critically than the works of artists who have addressed a wider range of social concerns.

Émilie Charmy

Émilie Charmy

Still Life c1904. After moving to Paris in 1902 she produced a series of technically innovative paintings using intense colors, thickly applied paint, seemingly crude brushwork and a tendency towards abstraction that would persist throughout her career. She became friendly with Henri Matisse and Charles Camoin, exhibiting with the Fauves at the Salon des Indépendants and Salon d’Autumne.

Kees van Dongen

Kees van Dongen

Woman with Cherries on Her Hat 1905. Cornelis Theodorus Maria van Dongen, usually known as Kees van Dongen or just Van Dongen, was a Dutch painter and one of the Fauves. He gained a reputation for his sensuous, at times garish, portraits.

Georges Braque

Georges Braque

The Port of La Ciotat, 1907. This is is one of the more naturalistic paintings Braque made at La Ciotat. His work there became increasingly abstract—brushstrokes gained autonomy while the objects they depicted became more cryptic. Space became more ambiguous and Braque became a leading figure in Cubism

 

 

 

Fauvist art can be identified by the following features:

 

  • Bright and bold colours;

  • Instinctive brush strokes;

  • Non natural colour;

  • Use of pure cultures;

  • Traditional subjects;

  • Simplified scenes;

  • Colour to express emotion;

  • Omission of  detail;

Artists from this period include:

 

  • Henri Matisse 1869 - 1954

  • André Derain 1880 - 1954

  • Maurice de Vlaminck 1876 - 1958

  • Albert Marquet 1875 - 1947

  • Raoul Dufy 1877 – 1953

  • Émilie Charmy 1878 - 1974

  • Kees van Dongen 1877-1968

  • Georges Braque 1882 - 1963

  • Othon Friesz 1879 - 1949

  • Jacqueline Marval 1866 - 1932

  • Marguerite Zorach 1887 - 1968

  • Émile Othon Friesz 1879 - 1949

Key Features
Key Artists

Key Fauvist Artists

Henri Matisse

Henri Matisse

maurice de vlaminck

maurice de vlaminck

Andre Derain

Andre Derain

Portrait by Matisse

ÉmilieCharmy

ÉmilieCharmy

Self_Portrait_with_an_Album_c_1907__1912.jpg

Geroges Braque

Geroges Braque

Jacqueline Marval, self portrait

Jacqueline Marval, self portrait

Kees van Dongen

Kees van Dongen

Roaul Dufy

Roaul Dufy

André Derain

André Derain

circa_1903

Albert Marquet

Albert Marquet

Marguerite Zorach, photo

Marguerite Zorach, photo

Artists who directly influenced Fauvism

Henri Edmond Cross

Henri Edmond Cross

Le Bois, 1906-1907

John Peter Russell

John Peter Russell

La Mer a La Spezia, 1896

Paul Cézanne

Paul Cézanne

The Large Bathers 1906

Paul Signac

Paul Signac

Concarneau (study), 1891

Paul Gauguin

Paul Gauguin

Day of the Gods 1893

Van Gogh

Van Gogh

The Night Café, 1888

Key Influences

The Symbolist painter Gustave Moreau was the movement's first inspirational teacher; as a professor at the École des Beaux-Arts in Paris, he pushed his students, including Henri Matisse and George Roualt, to think outside of the lines of formality and to follow their visions.  Matisse said of him, "He did not set us on the right roads, but off the roads. He disturbed our complacency." "With him one was able to discover the sort of work most suited to one's temperament."

 

In 1896, Matisse, then an unknown art student, visited the Australian Impressionist artist John Peter Russell on the island of Belle Île off Brittany.The next year he returned as Russell's student and abandoned his earth-coloured palette for bright Impressionist colours, later stating, "Russell was my teacher, and Russell explained colour theory to me". Russell had been a close friend of Vincent van Gogh and gave Matisse a Van Gogh drawing.

 

Post-Impressionists (Pointillists) such as Henri Edmond Cross and Paul Signac were more interested in creating harmonies of pure colour than in harmonising the colours of a particular landscape or natural scene. When Paul Signac published his Neo-Impressionist treatise in 1899, Matisse was immediately attracted to his ideas about colour and composition, and in 1904 the he spent time with Cross and Signac in St Tropez where Signac had a studio. Matisse and the other Fauves were excited by their approach to colour, however they lacked the scientific intent of Pointillism. Rather, they emphasised the expressive potential of colour, employing it arbitrarily.

 

Vlaminck's rough handling of paint, squeezing paint directly onto the canvas from the tube, was influenced by Vincent Van Gogh, whose work he'd seen in 1901. However, the Fauve artists (especially Matisse and Derain) tended to combine the vigour of Van Gogh's colour and brushwork with the tempering influence of other artists whose emphasis on structural values was more pronounced.

 

Space was also a defining characteristic of Fauvism, influenced by Post-Impressionists like Paul Cezanne. In 1899 Matisse purchased a Cezanne Bathers and spent the years of 1899 to 1901 evolving a method of translating his visual experience in a way that could accommodate the lessons of both Cezanne and Van Gogh.  Instead of trying to show space as three-dimensional, Matisse focused on flattening out the space, working in planes rather than depth, something that would later influence Pablo Picasso and his Cubist colleagues.   As well, Matisse admired Cézanne's  "merit of wanting the tones to be forces in a painting".

 

Matisse and Derain also studied the work of Paul Gauguin, and their works shared the latter's emphasis on broad areas of colour. His interest in "primitive" art and his stress on pure and non-naturalistic colour provided precedents for the Fauvists' interest in non-Western art and the expressive potential of hues. He was also attracted to Gauguin's sculptures.

 

At the turn of the Century, the admiration for primitive traditions extended to their aesthetic value, entirely apart from the context of their creation. Matisse, an inveterate museum browser, had probably encountered African sculptures at the Trocadéro museum with fellow Fauve painter Maurice de Vlaminck, before embarking on a spring 1906 trip to North Africa. After returning that summer, Matisse painted two versions of The Young Sailor  in which he replaced the first version's naturalistically contoured facial features with a more rigidly abstract visage reminiscent of a mask.

 

Fauvism was short lived, and by the end of the decade, artists in the group had diverged toward more individual interests. Nevertheless, Fauvism remains significant for it demonstrated modern art’s ability to evoke intense rhythm and mood through radical visual form.  The use of intense colour as a vehicle for describing light and space, as well as for communicating the artist's emotional state proved to be an important precursor to Cubism and Expressionism and an inspiration for future modes of abstraction. 

 

The work of Henri Matisse, in particular, whose own development as an artist is almost synonymous with the development of the Fauvism movement, was largely preoccupied with colour as a means of personal expression - colour in its pure and unmixed state composed in the artist's mind a form of pure expression. A sky could be orange, a tree crimson red, a face any combination of seemingly clashing colours, with the end result being a wholly independent abstraction of the artist's perception, rather than an abstraction of the physical form as was common in Impressionism.

Matisse and Derain at Collioure in 1905

Collioure, France
Andre Derain
André Derain
André Derain
Henri Matisse
Henri Matisse
Henre Matisse
André Derain
Andre Derain

The chief proponents of Fauvism were Henri Matisse and Andre Derain. Just as Monet and Renoir had painted together at  La Grenouillére (the Frog Pond) in 1869, in 1905  friends Matisse and Derain spent a summer painting together at Collioure, a fishing village near the Spanish border. It could be said that even though the style that was to become known as Fauvism had been evolving since the late 1800s, Collioure was the birthplace of Fauvism as we know it today. It was an astonishingly productive period of co-operation between the two artists that took them beyond the confines of Post-Impressionism and the pointilist/divisionalist techniques of Signac and Cross. 

 

Derain found Matisse's methodical experimentation with colour and compositional structure could assist him to develop his own talents. His paintings, which included many views of the heights overlooking the bay, show his rapid powers of assimilation and individual advance. He employed a mixed techniques, sometimes painting in flat areas at at other times using a rainbow-hued pointillism. His palette was light and flowerlike, rich and varied in its intensities and nuances with cool tones of lavender, green and violet and warm ones of orange vermilion and pink. 

 

Matisse, intoxicated with the climate, dashed off numerous small, scintillating sketches that sparkled brilliantly with colour. Like Derain, he enhanced the pointillist technique techniques through the use of cross hatchings and swirls. He allowed the white canvas to act as colour and texture in his works, which appeared even more unfinished than Derain's.

 

Source: Russell T. Clement, Les Fauves: A Sourcebook, 1994

Matisse and Derain

Henri Matisse, Open Window, Collioure, 1905

Suggested Videos and  Reading

Note the logic in the way in which Matisse has applied his colours.

 

They function in complementary pairs—orange-red masts over blue hulls, red blossoms amid green leaves on the wall, opposing reflections of turquoise and pink.

 

Complements such as these become more intense when seen next to each other. Isolated by bare areas of the canvas, the combinations generate a visual vibrato that keeps our eye fixed on the surface.

 

The angled, out-flung doors invite into the scene, but different brushstrokes in each “zone” set up cross-rhythms that impede recession: wide sweeps in the room’s interior, short wavy lines or staccato dabs in the view beyond.

Additional Resources

In this exercise, choose a subject you find uplifting, a scene, a portrait or a still life, and paint using vibrant colours, being mindful of how well your palette works together.

bottom of page